|
|
Levels
of Performance
|
|
Criteria
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
1. Organization and Clarity:
viewpoints and responses are outlined
both clearly and orderly.
|
Unclear in most parts
|
Clear in some parts but not over all
|
Most clear and orderly in all parts
|
Completely clear and orderly
presentation
|
|
2. Use of Arguments:
reasons are given to support viewpoint.
|
Few or no relevant reasons given
|
Some relevant reasons given
|
Most reasons given: most relevant
|
Most relevant reasons given in support
|
|
3. Use of Examples and Facts:
examples and facts are given to support
reasons.
|
Few or no relevant supporting
examples/facts
|
Some relevant examples/facts given
|
Many examples/facts given: most relevant
|
Many relevant supporting examples and
facts given
|
|
4. Use of Rebuttal:
arguments made by the other teams are
responded to and dealt with effectively.
|
No effective counter-arguments made
|
Few effective counter-arguments made
|
Some effective counter-arguments made
|
Many effective counter-arguments made
|
|
5. Presentation Style:
tone of voice, use of gestures, and
level of enthusiasm are convincing to audience.
|
Few style features were used; not
convincingly
|
Few style features were used
convincingly
|
All style features were used, most
convincingly
|
All style features were used
convincingly
|